No Canadian courts face public international legal issues more often than the Federal Court and the Federal Court of Appeal. In such areas as immigration, taxation, national security, intellectual property and judicial review of federal government action generally, the federal courts regularly confront international legal issues. How international law is received in our law—both substantively and procedurally—is therefore of especial importance to these courts.
Three recent cases—two from the Federal Court and one from the Federal Court of Appeal—have considered the question of whether expert opinion on international legal issues is admissible in evidence. This issue has generated a great deal of inconsistent, and often under-reasoned, Canadian jurisprudence in the last twenty years. But the three cases discussed below suggest we are finally moving in the right direction.
Continue reading “Recent Federal Courts decisions on expert evidence of international law”
In a recent debate in the Senate, the Hon. Murray Sinclair made some important comments about Bill C-262, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act. His powerful and moving speech is worth reading for many reasons, but I am especially interested in what he considers the legal effect of Bill C-262 will be. In short, he does not think this bill will implement the Declaration in federal law. I agree.
Continue reading “Does Bill C-262 implement the UNDRIP? Senator Sinclair says no”
After three years of serving as Executive Legal Officer at the Supreme Court of Canada–and therefore not maintaining my web site–I am back in private practice in Vancouver and Ottawa. So I’m relaunching my web site.
The new site is mostly a blog about the reception of public international legal norms in Canadian law, to complement my continued writing on that subject.